The Status of EU-Israel Relations: Sanctions, Association Agreement, and Israel’s Growing Isolation in Europe

Avraham Spraragen, J Street Policy and Research Coordinator and Dr. Maya Sion-Tzidkiyahu, Director of Israel-Europe Relations at Mitvim
on June 10, 2026

Download as PDF

Israel has become increasingly isolated on the European continent, given the extremism of the current Israeli government and its military conduct in Gaza and across the Middle East. Reflecting this isolation, four member states of the European Union (EU) boycotted the Eurovision Song Contest in Austria last month in protest of Israel’s inclusion. Meanwhile, Israel faces ongoing legal proceedings at The Hague concerning genocide and war crimes in Gaza. The EU-Israel Association Agreement governing the relationship hangs in the balance and the EU is implementing additional sanctions against violent Israeli settlers and their organizations in the West Bank for violating Palestinian human rights. If Israel does not reverse course, it should not be surprised if it finds itself similarly isolated in the United States, where popular support for Israel is already declining. This issue brief examines the three rounds of EU sanctions against violent Israeli settlers and settler organizations, the benefits of the Association Agreement and its potential suspension, the latest developments on Israel-Palestine in six EU hotspots, as well as the impact on Israel of its growing isolation in Europe and how a future Israeli government can reverse this trend.

EU Sanctions on Violent Israeli Settlers and Settler Organizations

Last month, the EU adopted new sanctions against major settler organizations and their leaders for supporting and financing settler violence and violations of Palestinian human rights in the West Bank. The following is an overview of the latest round of EU sanctions and the two previous rounds:

May 2026: The EU sanctioned the Nachala Settlement Movement and its director Daniella Weiss, Israeli NGO Regavim and its director Meir Deutsch, Hashomer Yosh NGO and its president Avichai Suissa, and the Amana cooperative association of the settler movement Gush Emunim. These proscribed individuals and entities are now subject to an asset freeze, a prohibition on funds, and a ban on travel to the EU. With these latest sanctions, the EU directly targeted settlement movement leadership, aiming to counter settler violence, settlement expansion, Palestinian displacement and dispossession, as well as other “serious and systematic human rights abuses against Palestinians in the West Bank.”

July 2024: The EU sanctioned right-wing Israeli extremist group Tzav 9; two other entities, Moshe’s Farm in the Jordan Valley and Zvi’s Farm in the West Bank; and five settlers, Moshe Sharvit, Zvi Bar Yosef, Baruch Marzel, Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein, and Isaschar Manne.

April 2024 Sanctions: The EU sanctioned Israeli settler groups, Lehava and Hilltop Youth, as well as four settlers, Meir Ettinger, Elisha Yered, Neria Ben Pazi, and Yinon Levi.

The EU-Israel Association Agreement: Benefits and Potential Suspension

Benefits to Israel of the Agreement: The EU-Israel Association Agreement provides the legal and institutional framework for relations between the EU and Israel. The optimism generated by the Oslo peace process enabled the 1995 signing of the Association Agreement, which officially came into force in 2000. EU-Israel relations are expansive, marked by cooperation in trade, investment, research, innovation, education, culture, aviation, and agriculture. Trade relations between the EU and Israel are governed by a Free Trade Area that is part of the Agreement. The EU is Israel’s largest trading partner, accounting for 31.7 percent of Israel’s total trade in goods in 2025. Last year, 33.1 percent of Israel’s imports came from the EU and 29.4 percent of its exports went to the EU. Under the Agreement, Israel benefits from the EU’s Horizon Europe program for research and innovation, Erasmus+ education program, and Open Skies aviation pact (about 70 percent of Israel’s international flights are to and from Europe). This makes the Association Agreement not merely a trade framework, but a strategic pillar of Israel’s economic resilience.

Potential Suspension of the Agreement: In February 2024, the leaders of Ireland and Spain sent a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen calling for an “urgent review” of Israel’s compliance with the human rights and democracy provisions of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. After withstanding much pressure, von der Leyen – a longtime ally of Israel – announced a proposal for partial suspension in her September 2025 State of the Union address. The Commission then formally presented the Council of the EU with a proposal to “suspend certain trade-related provisions” of the Agreement.

Unanimous approval by the EU’s 27 member states is needed to revoke the Association Agreement, but a partial suspension requires only a weighted majority of 15 member states, which represents 65 percent of the EU population. This threshold has not yet been crossed. Ireland, Spain, and Slovenia are leading the suspension efforts, which have been resisted by Germany, Italy, and the Czech Republic. Given the high threshold and so long as the positioning of Berlin, Rome, and Prague holds, it is unlikely that the Agreement will be partially suspended.

EU Hotspots for Israel-Palestine Activity

There are numerous hotspots for Israel-Palestine activity in Europe today. The degree to which the governments of some of these countries have distanced themselves from Israel and the timing of their distancing reflect their history, different ideologies, political stances, and reactions to public opinion. The following is an overview of the latest Israel-Palestine developments in six EU hotspots:

(1) Ireland: Ireland is one of the most pro-Palestine countries in the world, and its government (along with Spain’s) is one of the fiercest EU critics of Israeli government policy. The “Israeli Settlements (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill” is expected to pass in Ireland this summer, criminalizing the import of goods from Israeli settlements.

Last month, several Irish nationals, including the sister of the Irish president, participated in the “Global Sumud Flotilla” to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza. A diplomatic crisis ensued when Israeli forces detained the participants and Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir posted a video glorifying abuse of the detainees. Another Irish-Israeli diplomatic spat occurred last year when the Dublin City Council announced its decision to rename a park that carries the name of the late Israeli President Chaim Herzog to “Free Palestine Park” or “Hind Rajab Park.”

(2) Spain: Last year, Spain became the second EU country after Slovenia to implement a trade ban on goods from illegal Israeli settlements. Spain has also enshrined into law an arms embargo on Israel, blocking transit through Spanish ports for ships carrying fuel for the IDF, denying access to Spanish airspace for state aircraft transporting defense material to Israel, and banning from Spanish territory “all persons directly involved in the genocide, human rights violations and war crimes in Gaza.” Far-right Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, are sanctioned by Spain and prohibited from entering the country.

In March, the Spanish-Israeli rift deepened when Spain permanently withdrew its ambassador to Israel. In response, Israel evicted Spain from the Civil-Military Coordination Center in Kiryat Gat, the multi-national center overseeing the Gaza ceasefire. Spanish nationals, including the former mayor of Barcelona, participated in the aforementioned Gaza flotilla and pro-Palestine citizen activism is widespread in Spain.

(3) France: This week, France announced (alongside four other countries) coordinated “sanctions and other measures to hold extremist settlers accountable for the horrific levels of settler violence against Palestinian civilians.” Per this announcement, France banned four leaders of settler organizations, 21 violent settler leaders, and Smotrich from French territory. Ben-Gvir was previously banned from France and the Israeli government was recently blocked from participating in next week’s Eurosatory defense exhibition in Paris. Last month, the Israeli Defense Ministry halted all defense procurement from France in response to French measures that the Israeli government claims have “harmed Israel’s security.” These measures include prohibiting Israeli aircraft from using French airspace in the war against Iran, though France has not publicly confirmed this prohibition. French President Emmanuel Macron has also signed a joint statement warning businesses against “bid[ding] for construction tenders for E1 or other settlement developments.” Together with Sweden, his country is pushing the EU to restrict imports from illegal settlements.

In July 2025, France and Saudi Arabia co-chaired a United Nations conference on the two-state solution, where for the first time, all 22 member states of the Arab League jointly condemned October 7 and called for Hamas to disarm. The “New York Declaration,” endorsed by 142 UN member states, also outlines a phased roadmap for ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and establishing an independent Palestinian state. France recognized the State of Palestine in September 2025 and led 9 other Western countries to follow suit. Today, Ireland, Spain, and 13 other EU member states (as well as the United Kingdom) recognize Palestinian statehood. France has also formed a Franco-Palestinian committee to help draft a new constitution for Palestine and will be hosting Israeli and Palestinian civil society organizations in Paris on June 12 to further lay the groundwork for a two-state solution.

(4) Italy: The extreme right-wing government of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has been one of Israel’s closest allies in recent years. In April, however, Italy suspended its longstanding bilateral defense agreement with Israel. This suspension came after shots were fired by Israeli forces at a convoy of Italian UN peacekeepers (UNIFIL) in Lebanon – damaging one vehicle but causing no injuries. The Italian government summoned the Israeli ambassador and the Israeli government, in turn, summoned the Italian ambassador.

Last month, Meloni signed the aforementioned joint statement warning businesses against supporting Israeli settlement expansion. Italian nationals, including prominent Italian politicians, were among the Gaza flotilla activists, and Meloni sharply condemned their treatment by Ben-Gvir. Italy has faced a wave of pro-Palestine general strikes and transport blockades across the country. Hundreds of thousands of Italians have demonstrated, and violent clashes with police have broken out. Meanwhile, the Meloni government continues to protect Israel at the EU level, including opposition to the partial suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement.

(5) Germany: Historically one of Israel’s staunchest allies, Germany is the second-largest arms exporter to Israel – ranking second only to the United States. In August 2025, Germany partially suspended weapons exports to Israel for use in Gaza. German arms exports to Israel fell to zero in the weeks following the embargo. Berlin lifted the embargo in November of last year, several weeks after the Gaza ceasefire, resuming its longstanding policy of examining weapons exports to Israel on a case-by-case basis. The government of Chancellor Friedrich Merz continues to protect Israel at the EU level, including opposition to the partial suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement and, most recently, insisting upon sanctions against Ben-Gvir only and not Smotrich.

Germany has seen mass pro-Palestine protests and violent clashes with police. The country has also been mired in controversy surrounding the case of five activists from Palestine Action, known as “Ulm 5,” who attacked the German branch of the Israeli arms manufacturer, Elbit Systems. The activists have been charged with membership in a criminal organization and subjected to prolonged detention with severe restrictions.

(6) Hungary: In April, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saw his closest European ally defeated in the Hungarian election. The far-right former Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who has a long record of antisemitism and support for Netanyahu, was replaced by Péter Magyar. Prime Minister Magyar revoked his predecessor’s withdrawal from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The new Hungarian leader has said that, in accordance with Hungary’s renewed commitment to the ICC’s Rome Statute, he would detain Netanyahu (who faces an ICC arrest warrant for war crimes in Gaza) if the Israeli prime minister visited Hungary. Crucially, the latest package of EU sanctions against major settler organizations and their leaders required unanimous support from the 27 EU member states and Hungary had long been the holdout; Magyar reversed Orbán’s veto, removing the barrier to new EU sanctions.

Impact on Israel and the Way Forward

Israel’s growing isolation in Europe reflects the erosion of key pillars of its normative standing, with growing risks also for its security and economy. The EU-Israel Association Agreement, which underpins preferential trade and cooperation in so many important fields, is now under sustained political pressure. Both full and partial suspensions remain unlikely, but repeated calls for suspension create chronic uncertainty for investors, businesses, and universities.

Israel’s image among European publics has deteriorated sharply. This societal alienation fuels municipal and parliamentary activism, cultural and academic boycotts, and pressure on governments that have traditionally shielded Israel, including Germany and Italy, to distance themselves, constrain arms exports, or suspend defense cooperation.

Targeted EU sanctions on violent settlers and organizations supporting settlement expansion mark a qualitative shift. While such steps rightly stigmatize Israel’s actions in the West Bank and lack of action regarding violent settlers, they nevertheless normalize coercive tools against it within EU practice and make further European or national-level measures more politically and legally feasible.

Isolation in Europe narrows Israel’s diplomatic maneuvering space with EU partners and increases Israel’s asymmetric dependence on the United States. A different Israeli government with a concrete diplomatic and conflict‑resolution strategy could still halt and partially reverse this trend, but only through a clear diplomatic break with the current trajectory: curbing settler violence, strengthening a reformed Palestinian Authority, advancing the Gaza ceasefire to its second phase, and pursuing agreements with Lebanon and Syria without compromising its security. If Israel returns to a credible diplomatic path, European governments will have a basis to change course.